Researchers searched databases for four of the most expensive failures in history, ranging from financial mismanagement to simply running out of funds. They track down the most well-funded startups that eventually fail.

Reasons Why Startups Fail

Loss has been on our minds lately. What for? Partly because it’s a fantastic counterpoint to the standard survivorship bias-laden stories we read, and partly because failure is essential to the algorithms that underpin our product.

However, scientists discovered several more unusual — and dramatic — reasons for failure, such as:

  • Financial deception
  • Lawsuits
  • A sought-after founder
  • A worldwide epidemic

Experts split down the firms that collapsed by how much money they raised, starting with those who raised more than $100 million. (Yikes.) Next, based on news accounts, founder post-mortems, and corporate comments, we emphasize conversations regarding the causes for loss.

It is prudent to consider twice before starting a business. The failure rate of startups is quite high. However, such a large proportion might be seen positively. It implies that there is much to be learned from the errors of others. It’s normal for a new business owner to make mistakes. However, it is not essential to repeat the mistakes that led to the failure of previous businesses.

Not every company that fails is a failure. This appears to be a contradiction. Even a failing business, though, made a contribution. Some achieved breakthroughs in certain fields that helped other people or businesses. Other failing businesses were able to reimburse their shareholders.


Every Aereo subscriber was given a small broadcast TV antenna as part of the infrastructure that powered its online service, and it exploited this to imply that their service was no different from slapping a pair of bunny ears on your television. Aereo would be able to avoid paying retransmission fees for broadcasters’ material in this fashion. But, when it came down to it, neither broadcasters nor the US Supreme Court believed this reasoning.

Amp’d Mobile

Perhaps it was Verizon’s latest in-court plea to cease giving out expensive frequencies for which it couldn’t pay, or perhaps it was the harsh truth that it’ll purportedly have only $9,000 in the bank as of next Monday — but Amp’d Mobile looks to be ready to call it quits.

Beyond The Rack

Beyond the Rack, founded in 2009 by former Saks executive Yona Shtern, offers deep discounts on designer clothing, accessories, and home décor. The deals are usually for 48 hours and are notified through email. According to court documents, the firm has 14 million subscribers and 450,000 active purchasers.


According to court documents, Beyond the Rack failed to make a profit and spent its money on “aggressive and costly marketing activities targeted at encouraging client growth.” According to the paperwork, it filed for protection with less than $1 million in cash.

Expand Networks

Expand Networks’ technology received praise, but its operational performance was far less outstanding. According to court filings, it was losing $ 250,000 per month and earning $ 11 million in 2010. It failed to make a breakthrough despite being a pioneer in its sector.

Final Comments on These Doomed Businesses

Having venture capital money on your hands does not ensure startup development. The corporate world is always evolving. As a result, any organization that cannot keep up with these developments would most certainly collapse. It makes no difference if there are economic incentives behind this one.